« bash_history not working in VE (virtual environment) of openvzSpeciale Joomla! hostingdienst gestart »

4 comments

Comment from: Michael Renner [Visitor] Email · http://amd.co.at/
fwiw - the "swapsize 2 times internal memory" constant is very outdated and quite harmful if applied on "modern" systems.
13/05/08 @ 00:12
Comment from: goe [Visitor] Email
so 512MB are enough even for snapshots of big containers of, say, 100GB and more?
16/01/09 @ 17:38
Comment from: Robert - Lagniappe Internet [Visitor] Email · http://www.lagniappeinternet.com
Depends on the fs being backed up. Not the size of the fs, but how often writes occur. The snapshot volume holds new / changed data to be written to disk. This allows the snapshot itself to remain static while the backup occurs. When the umount occurs the writes are then flushed to the real fs. So the snapshot volume MUST be able to hold every write that occurs while the backup is being performed. A small website with some email accounts would need much less snapshot space than say a picture hosting site. And the best part is all of the re-direction occurs behind the scenes so your application never need know it's being backed up.
31/03/09 @ 22:29
Comment from: Greg [Visitor]
Excellent article except that i'm a kind of newbie and i'm lost with what needs to be done here. i installed a new server with proxmox and i get the "ERROR: unable to detect lvm volume group, using 'suspend' mode" error when trying the snapshot from its interface. other types work fine.
Is there a way to apply when server is already running with proxmox? do I need to do it on each created VE or is it at the root level and then how to apply? any help needed.
Thanks
02/07/09 @ 11:07

This post has 6 feedbacks awaiting moderation...

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)